Choppy Seas Ahead: Navigating Chapter 13 Bankruptcies in Uncertain Times

By Sarah Doerr, Moss & Barnett

A recent wave of lawsuits brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) seeks to address alleged “inaccurate reporting” by debt collectors and creditors. These lawsuits follow one of two trends.

The first trend sees consumer attorneys alleging violations by furnishers of credit reporting on accounts included in a consumer’s bankruptcy. Plaintiffs assert that reporting of “past due” (or similar), prior to the bankruptcy, violates the FCRA, even if that reporting was accurate. By the plaintiffs’ logic, reporting on any account ultimately included in a bankruptcy should only reflect the ultimate discharge.

The second trend – arguably even more alarming – has consumer attorneys bringing lawsuits challenging the post-discharge credit reporting on debts that were not included in a bankruptcy discharge, i.e., reaffrmed debts. Consumer bankruptcies were down over 30% in 2020, as compared to 2019. While it stands to reason that the COVID-19 pandemic’s devastating effect on certain sectors of the economy will eventually lead to an increase in consumer bankruptcies, consumer bankruptcy attorneys are, in the short term, looking for new revenue streams and theories of recovery. “Postdischarge review” of credit reports is a service many consumer attorneys are now offering as a means to scrutinize the actions of creditors and debt collectors for potential FCRA lawsuits in federal court.

Furnishers can take heart, however. Most courts have held that as long as the discharge is reported as well, the FCRA does not prohibit the accurate post-discharge credit reporting of debts that were delinquent during the pendency of a bankruptcy. Still, furnishers often delete the tradeline on accounts included in bankruptcy rather than risk an FCRA lawsuit for reporting the information inaccurately.

Whether in connection with threatened or filed litigation, or treatment in a Chapter 13 plan, creditors, debt collectors, and other furnishers should regularly review with counsel the recent case law and regulations regarding credit reporting during the pendency of a bankruptcy, and after discharge.


Sarah Doerr

Sarah Doerr

GGI member firm
Moss & Barnett
Law Firm Services
Minneapolis (MN), USA
T: +1 612 877 5340
E: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
W: lawmoss.com

Moss & Barnett is a multidisciplinary, client-centred law firm that gets results through team-based custom counsel. They offer business and private clients forward-thinking strategies in Minnesota and beyond. Their goal is to be a strategic and critical partner to their clients and provide value that extends far beyond the practice of law.

Sarah Doerr practices in the areas of bankruptcy and creditors’ remedies. She has experience in both individual and commercial bankruptcy matters and regularly represents secured and unsecured creditors. She also counsels clients in matters related to bankruptcy, insolvency, and restructuring.


Published: Debt Collection, Restructuring & Insolvency Newsletter, No. 13, Spring 2021 l Photo: yanmingzhang - stock.adobe.com

Ggi Logo 150x109px

GGI Global Alliance AG

Sihlbruggstrasse 140
6340 Baar
Switzerland

Contact

T: +41 41 7252500
F: +41 41 7252501
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.ggi.com