By Michael Wendler, Wendler Tremml Rechtsanwälte
On 28 May 2014, the Official Journal of the European Union No. 159 published Directive 2014167/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (the IMI Regulation).
By Michiel Teekens, TeekensKarstens advocaten notarissen
The Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 (“the Regulation”) regulates jurisdiction between persons, including companies, located in Member States. The Regulation provides general principles for jurisdiction, but also allows contractual parties to agree to deviate through an implementation clause or a forum clause.
By Ralph A. Dengler and Thomas J. Bean, Gibbons
IP practitioners on both sides of the "v." should take heed that the Federal Circuit Advisory Council ("the CAFC Council") has unanimously approved a "Model Order Limiting Excess Patent Claims and Prior Art." Citing a "[l]ack of discipline" by the asserting party, the CAFC Council recounted that the resulting "superfluous claims and prior art" have contributed to increasing the expense and burden of patent litigation. And rather than dealing with the number of claims and prior art references on an ad hoc basis, as is presently done, the aspirational Model Order sets default numerical limits on the number of asserted patent claims and prior art references.
By Robert E. Rudnick, Gibbons
On July 8, Teresa Stanek Rea, Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), announced on her official blog the launch of the Global Patent Search Network ("GPSN").
By Andrew P. MacArthur, Gibbons
According to a recent Central District of California decision, a declaratory judgment plaintiff may be entitled to attorney fees if it prevails on non-infringement in a patent case. Homeland Housewares, LLC v. Sorensen Research and Dev. Trust, No. 11-03720, slip op. at 7-8 (C.D.C.A. Jun. 27, 2013).
By Robert E. Rudnick, Ralph A. Dengler and Todd M. Nosher, Gibbons
The attorney-client privilege is one of the most sacrosanct and inviolable, allowing full and frank dialogue between client and counsel. The recent decision in BSP Software LLC v. Motio, Inc., 1-12-cv-02100 (ND Ill. July 9, 2013) DN 141, Order has broad implications for this well-established privilege, and important lessons-learned for when it might be waived.
Currently only the paper edition of the EU Gazette has legal effect. Effective 1 July 2013, only the online version will be legally binding. This binding change was published on 14 March 2013 in the paper edition. As Council Directive No. 216/2013, the Official Gazette of the European Union announced its own paper-based end. Instead the electronic version on the EUR-Lex website will become binding this summer. It is available under http://eur-lex.europa.eu. Access to EUR-Lex is free of charge and no registration is required. The Publications Office of the European Unit is responsible for administration.
By Sergio Guerrero Rosas, Guerrero y Santana, S.C.
In October 2012, President Felipe Calderón of Mexico announced the Federal Law for the Prevention and Identification of Operations with Resources of Unlawful Origin, better known as the Law Against Money Laundering, in the Official Publication of the Federation. Despite the early decision in the President's administration to confront the criminality which had become the major threat to the peace and integrity of the state – and to do so with all its available resources, in its first years, the government's strategy to bring down and arrest dozens of drug trafficking capos failed to place the same level of importance on the finances of the cartels.
By David Smyth and Christopher Poe, Brooks Pierce
On November 27, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged four Indian financial services firms with acting as unregistered broker-dealers in the United States. The firms were accused of providing brokerage services to institutional investors in the United States without registering with the SEC as required by Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). The SEC censured the firms, who paid a combined total of $1.8 million to settle the SEC's charges. These actions are part of a recent spate of activity for the SEC, which treats Section 15(a) seriously and enforces it to ensure that securities brokers satisfy professional standards, have adequate capital, treat their customers fairly and provide accurate disclosures to investors.
The GOLD GLOVE Trademark Infringement Action: Will Rawlings Strike Out For Failure to Adequately Plead Its Case?
By Catherine M. Clayton and Ralph A. Dengler, Gibbons
On January 7, 2013, Cincinnati Reds second baseman, and three-time Gold Glove Award-winner, Brandon Phillips, moved to dismiss Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. Inc.'s ("Rawlings") trademark infringement action arising from his use of a glove with gold-colored features.
More Articles ...
- Delaware District Court Takes Patent Damages Expert to Task
- PTO Announces Software Partnership Roundtable Meetings
- Patent Marking Under the America Invents Act - Virtual Marking
- Patent Classification Harmonization
- CAFC Reverses Inequitable Conduct Finding: Outside The Box Innovations v. Travel Caddy
- FTC Petitions for Certiorari in Reverse Payments Dispute
- New Derivation Rule -- 37 C.F.R. Part 42
- Declaratory Judgment Suit Over ROHAN Trademark
- Will the Supreme Court Weigh in on Reverse Payments in ANDA Cases -- Revisited
- Inter Partes Review Under AIA is Underway ...
- We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What?
- Trademark Parody? Ben & Jerry's Doesn't Think It's So Funny ....
- Akamai and McKesson: Inducement Liability for Infringement by Multiple Actors
- Yums v. Nike Update -- Two Amicus Curiae Briefs Filed: One Arguing Vacatur and Remand and the Second in Support of Yums
- Freelancer Survives "Live to Ride" Logo Dispute with Harley-Davidson -- For Now
- Color Trademarks Remain in Fashion: Second Circuit Sides with Louboutin
- Will the Supreme Court Weigh in on Reverse Payments in ANDA Cases?
- Reckitt Benckiser v. Tris Pharma - New Jersey Magistrate Finds No Trade Secret Misappropriation
- Norman IP v. Lexmark: Post AIA Joinder and the Rule 42 Trump Card
- Yums v. Nike -- Yums' Brief Re Jurisdiction and Covenants Not to Sue
- FTC Proposes Rules to Codify Reporting of Exclusive Patent Right Transfers in the Pharmaceutical Industry
- Don't Forget About Those Seven Provisions of the AIA Effective September 16, 2012!
- "Shield Act" Introduced to Thwart NPEs ...
- Wrigley v. Cadbury: Judge Newman Emphasizes Commercial Success and Copying
- (Still) Waiting for Akamai and McKesson ....
- Implementation of USPTO Rules Under the AIA is Underway: Preissuance Submissions
- The Franchise in Panama
- Trade Secrets Update
- Update - Hatch-Waxman Settlements: The FTC Regains Traction After Third Circuit Rules That Reverse Payments Violate Antitrust Law
- National Domestic Policy puts Freedom of Movement in Europe at Risk
- Fighting Fraud in Emerging Economies – Challenges for Overseas Business Operations & Expatriates
- Multiple Government Laws and Regulations Make Data Security Breach Recovery Efforts Complicated in the U.S.
- Disclosure Obligations Highlighted by Two Birds
- The Mabey & Johnson Case – Implications for Shareholders
- Voluntary Pledge to Increase the Quota of Women in Executive Positions Lacks Credibility
- Proposed Further Development of European Company Law
- European Union: Sales Law is Coming
- A standardized European Convention on the Sale of Goods by no means sells itself
- Uniform data protection law planned for the EU
- Threats to Non-U.S. Companies from the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
- Poorly conceived patent applications hinder inventions
- The long path to a standardized European patent